UKC
(Kent) SWSS has voted to pass this statement to make clear that we are
dissatisfied with the way the Disputes Committee handled allegations made
against a leading member, and the inadequate response from the leadership
during the aftermath. The processes used fell far below what members
expect from a revolutionary party which aims to address oppression. The
current situation is due to the failing of the central committee to acknowledge
these problems.
Allegations
of creeping autonomism and feminism from the leadership are unhelpful, and
appear designed to create divides within the party which do not exist.
More open discussion within the party is the only way to reconcile this
situation. We are making this statement not to create division, but
because we feel it is the only way we can continue to be active members of SWSS
on campus.
We are
calling for:
1.
A special conference, so that the problems which the party needs to deal with
can be dealt with democratically and student voices heard, in order that we can
continue to fight austerity, oppression and capitalism in unity.
2.
The removal of the member against whom allegations were made from public
positions in recognition of the fact that the Disputes Committee report was
barely accepted, and the Chair of the committee did not think he should be
exonerated.
3.
A commission into the party's constitution, the make-up of the Disputes
Committee, and how it will handle such cases in the future.
4.
The reinstatement of the 4 four members expelled in the pre-conference period,
as these expulsions were not made in the best interests of the party.
5.
Proper explanation for why Hannah Dee was removed from the Central Committee at
short notice.
University
of Kent SWSS
It's nice that I came across your blog.
ReplyDelete