Sussex & Brighton University SWSS condemns
in the strongest possible terms the Disputes Committee’s (DC) recent
handling of serious allegations against a leading member of the
organisation, the vote which ratified their report at conference, and
the subsequent failure of the central committee to address the current
crisis.
We note the failure of the DC in this case to carry out their
investigative process in an entirely impartial way due to their
composition, and the implications this has for any outcome they could
have reached. We also reject aspects of the line of questioning of the
two female comrades that came forward with the allegations as sexist,
and at odds with the principles of our tradition. We recognize that the
DC was faced with a difficult situation, with lack of precedent to
enable them to handle this effectively. For this we fault the CC’s
conduct with respect to W and the concerns she raised over the past few
years. We also fault them for their failure to intervene and correct for
failings in the DC’s procedure when they were so glaringly obvious, and
for what many will see as their intentional misleading of the
membership around the issue in past conferences.
To the CC, we say: not only have you failed W, X and every other
comrade that might once have trusted in our disputes procedures. You
have failed this entire organization, as well as the tradition in which
it stands, by absurdly insisting on the shambolic series of fuckups and
blunders that have constituted your “political response.” The list of
these includes a process of misinformation in the lead-up to this
conference and previous ones; banning the faction that tried to use our
democratic processes so that comrades could make an informed decision on
the DC report’s process; the removal or reshuffling of those CC members
and full-timers that aired critical concerns regarding the matter; the
moves to suppress debate in the organisation by asking comrades to “draw
a line under it”; the expulsion of four comrades for an alleged
“Facebook faction” (in practice a Facebook conversation) that is likely
no different in content to those serious debates in which comrades are
engaged today, in their branches and through other mediums of
communication; the political slurs directed at comrades who have openly
aired their views, including the unhelpful brandishing of “feminism” as
an apparent insult, as well as the wholly disingenuous implication that
the problem at hand is a “generational disconnect”; and the concomitant
new CC appointment to the Student Office.
The aforementioned cannot be seen as anything but an attempt to
“smash” critical studentvoices. These issues, coupled with the poor
treatment and lack of support offered to the two female comrades that
came forward with such grave allegations, has led to a complete
breakdown in the trust we have in your leadership. We express our utmost
concern for the fate of this organization and the role we hope we can
continue to play, as SWP members, in building a revolutionary
organization capable and worthy of leading the struggle against all
forms of oppression under capitalist society. It is with this in mind
that we write to you today, particularly in lieu of a public statement
on SocialistWorker.co.uk that shows a complete disconnect with the
political and personal burden your membership has come to bear as result
of this fiasco, but more crucially displays an apparent obliviousness
to the political reality that comrades are facing in their local unions,
campuses and campaigns as a result of this. Recent events have forced
us all to take a long look at how we found ourselves to be in this
position, faults in our democratic procedures, perhaps a narrowing of
space for debate, or a developing culture of political regurgitation and
acquiescence and the inevitable lack of accountability that results. It
is with the long-term view of how the party got here and what is
necessary for us to be able to move forward that Sussex & Brighton
University Branch came to an almost unanimous vote of no confidence in
the leadership. We will be moving for the current CC’s dismissal from
their post at the earliest available party decision-making body and/or
conference at which we can do so.
Finally, to our comrades in struggle, to our colleagues and our
friends, we would like to express our sincerest apologies for the recent
failures of our organisation. We understand the distress and distrust
that many of you have expressed as a result of this. We had hoped that
the few responses circulated by comrades would offer at least some
assurance that members of the SWP are fighting tooth and nail for the
principles we share, and this letter should come as confirmation that
Sussex & Brighton SWSS are no exception to this. We ask you to bear
with us, to give us the opportunity to exhaust this line of enquiry,
this line of protest, to allow us to fight for the very relevance (if
not existence) of the organization that has equipped us to become the
principled revolutionaries that you know us to be. And in turn we assure
you that we will continue to uphold the proud tradition we stand in,
that we will continue to fight oppression in our society in all its
forms and variants and that we shall never dismiss or shy away from the
criticisms and concerns of those in the movement and in the class as a
whole.
We Call for:
1) An emergency conference, so that this organization may resolve
this political crisis in a way that holds accountable those responsible
and gives the membership the clarity and confidence needed to implement
our political strategy moving forward.
2) An immediate public response that can provide clarity around the failures of the DC’s due process.
3) Delta to be removed from any official or public position within
our organization, particularly given disagreement on the DC with respect
to the question of Delta’s conduct.
4) The DC to resign their posts. Although we acknowledge the
difficult situation the DC was faced with, we argue that their ability
to carry out their functions as mandated by conference has been
undermined by recent events. It remains the case that many members,
including Comrade X, will not feel confident in taking their disputes to
the current DC in light of recent events.
Delta's membership should have been suspended immediately the allegation against him was made. To not do so was to be prejudiced with the idea that he probably had not commited rape.
ReplyDeleteHad the CC had a neutral belief, then they would have acted on the basis that he could
have commited rape, in which case once again his membership would have been suspended.
That his membership was not suspended tells us they thought him likely innocent, this
belief could only come from knowing him personally.
The DC investigation then, was carried out by people who knew him, with the tacit
belief from the CC that he was innocent.
animalmagic is right. He should have been suspended straight away.
ReplyDelete